Skip to content
CareShed

Population Health · Health Equity

Mapping America's care-access deserts.

CareShed scores every U.S. county on health-equity need — combining chronic-disease burden, care access, prevention gaps, and social vulnerability into one transparent index, so scarce resources reach the communities that need them most.

How the index worksData current as of July 18, 2026

Counties scored

2,956

US counties

Population covered

317,427,015

residents

Critical-need counties

298

top-decile need

States (highest need)

MS

avg score 91.9

Health-equity need map

Toggle between overall equity need and the care-access gap. Hover a county for detail.

Lower needHigher need
Critical need298

Highest combined burden, access, prevention & social need — prioritize.

High need443

Elevated need across multiple domains.

Moderate need739

Above-median need in some domains.

Lower need1,476

Lower relative need today — monitor.

Highest-need states

Mean county health-equity score.

MS
91.9
AR
83.5
OK
79.9
TN
73.9
TX
72.5
NM
70.6
AL
70.2
GA
69.7

Highest-need counties

Highest health-equity-need counties with state, tier, equity score, diabetes prevalence, and uninsured rate.
CountyTierEquity needDiabetesUninsured
Zavala, TXCritical10021.4%42.8%
Dimmit, TXCritical10021.5%41.6%
Jim Hogg, TXCritical99.920.2%41.3%
Kusilvak, AKCritical99.918.0%18.1%
Starr, TXCritical99.920.5%43.7%
Sioux, NDCritical99.820.1%13.9%
Zapata, TXCritical99.820.1%43.3%
Oglala Lakota, SDCritical99.823.8%18.9%
Quitman, MSCritical99.719.5%16.0%
Bethel, AKCritical99.714.7%15.9%
Willacy, TXCritical99.719.0%40.7%
Hudspeth, TXCritical99.617.4%36.9%
McKinley, NMCritical99.617.9%15.3%
Todd, SDCritical99.622.9%17.6%
Sharkey, MSCritical99.519.6%16.5%

What is computed vs. proposed

Every number here is computed from CDC PLACES public data. This v1 index blends four domains — chronic burden, care access, prevention gaps, and social vulnerability. The full CareShed model adds HRSA provider-shortage areas (careshed access), Census ACS social vulnerability, and a CDC-WONDER-validated explainable risk model with SHAP explanations; those are labeled as planned enhancements, not shown here as results.